100% CSP-ASSESSOR CORRECT ANSWERS - CSP-ASSESSOR VALID TEST OBJECTIVES

100% CSP-Assessor Correct Answers - CSP-Assessor Valid Test Objectives

100% CSP-Assessor Correct Answers - CSP-Assessor Valid Test Objectives

Blog Article

Tags: 100% CSP-Assessor Correct Answers, CSP-Assessor Valid Test Objectives, Real CSP-Assessor Testing Environment, CSP-Assessor Latest Exam Price, CSP-Assessor Valid Exam Simulator

After using our software, you will know that it is not too difficult to pass CSP-Assessor exam. You will find some exam techniques about how to pass CSP-Assessor exam from the exam materials and question-answer analysis provided by our Actualtests4sure. Besides, to make you be rest assured of our dumps, we provide CSP-Assessor Exam Demo for you to free download.

It is known to us that more and more companies start to pay high attention to the CSP-Assessor certification of the candidates. Because these leaders of company have difficulty in having a deep understanding of these candidates, may it is the best and fast way for all leaders to choose the excellent workers for their company by the CSP-Assessor Certification that the candidates have gained. There is no doubt that the CSP-Assessor certification has become more and more important for a lot of people. And with our CSP-Assessor exam questions. you can get the CSP-Assessor certification easily.

>> 100% CSP-Assessor Correct Answers <<

CSP-Assessor Valid Test Objectives, Real CSP-Assessor Testing Environment

Actualtests4sure alerts you that the syllabus of the Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification (CSP-Assessor) certification exam changes from time to time. Therefore, keep checking the fresh updates released by the Swift. It will save you from the unnecessary mental hassle of wasting your valuable money and time. Actualtests4sure announces another remarkable feature to its users by giving them the Swift CSP-Assessor Dumps updates until 1 year after purchasing the Swift CSP-Assessor certification exam pdf questions.

Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification Sample Questions (Q78-Q83):

NEW QUESTION # 78
An application only uses (i) the SWIFT API for reporting and gpi basic tracker calls through (ii) a tailored account not allowing business transactions management. Is this application in scope of the CSCF? (Select the correct answer)
*Swift Customer Security Controls Policy
*Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025
*Independent Assessment Framework
*Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines
*Independent Assessment Framework - High-Level Test Plan Guidelines
*Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025
*CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree
*CSP_controls_matrix_and_high_test_plan_2025
*Assessment template for Mandatory controls
*Assessment template for Advisory controls
*CSCF Assessment Completion Letter
*Swift_CSP_Assessment_Report_Template

  • A. No, it can be descoped because there is no business transaction management being performed
  • B. Yes, it is in scope and considered a customer connector because it reads business transaction data
  • C. Yes, it is in scope because the API connection method is less secure than SWIFT interfaces
  • D. No, it is not in scope because the API connection method is not in scope of the CSP

Answer: A

Explanation:
The CSCF applies to all SWIFT users and components that handle SWIFT-related data or connectivity, including customer connectors and interfaces. The scope is defined by the "Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025" and the "CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree." Let's evaluate the scenario and options:
*The application uses the SWIFT API for reporting and gpi basic tracker calls (e.g., tracking payment statuses via the SWIFT gpi Tracker) through a tailored account that does not allow business transaction management (e.g., creating or sending MT messages like MT103). This limits its functionality to read-only or monitoring activities.
*CSCF Scope: The CSCF applies to components that process or manage SWIFT business transactions (e.g., payment messages) or provide connectivity to the SWIFT network. The "CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree" classifies components into architecture types (A1-A4), with customer connectors and interfaces in scope if they handle transactional data or enable SWIFT connectivity. Reporting and tracking via APIs, without transaction management, do not constitute business transaction processing.
*Option A: Yes, it is in scope and considered a customer connector because it reads business transaction data This is incorrect. While the application reads transaction data (e.g., via gpi Tracker), the CSCF scope is primarily focused on components that manage or transmit business transactions (e.g., creating or sending messages). Reading data for reporting purposes does not classify it as a customer connector requiring full CSCF compliance unless it also handles transactional flows. The "Swift_CSP_Assessment_Report_Template" focuses on transactional interfaces.
*Option B: No, it can be descoped because there is no business transaction management being performed This is correct. Since the application does not manage business transactions (e.g., it cannot initiate or modify payments), it falls outside the primary scope of the CSCF. The "Independent Assessment Framework" allows for descoping of components that do not process transactional data, provided they are isolated from the SWIFT secure zone. This aligns with the "CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree," which excludes non- transactional reporting tools from mandatory assessment.
*Option C: No, it is not in scope because the API connection method is not in scope of the CSP This is incorrect. The SWIFT API connection method is within the CSP scope if it interacts with SWIFT services (e.g., gpi Tracker), but the key factor is the lack of transaction management, not the API itself.
*Option D: Yes, it is in scope because the API connection method is less secure than SWIFT interfaces This is incorrect. Security of the connection method (e.g., API vs. traditional interfaces) does not determine CSCF scope. The scope is based on functionality (transaction management), and the statement's premise about security is not a valid criterion per CSCF guidelines.
Summary of Correct answer:
The application is not in scope of the CSCF and can be descoped because it does not perform business transaction management (B).
References to SWIFT Customer Security Programme Documents:
*Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025: Defines scope based on transaction management.
*CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree: Guides descoping of non-transactional components.
*Independent Assessment Framework: Allows descoping of reporting-only applications.
========


NEW QUESTION # 79
On which one of the following components must a Password/PIN Policy not be defined and implemented as per the CSCF? (Select the correct answer)
*Swift Customer Security Controls Policy
*Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025
*Independent Assessment Framework
*Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines
*Independent Assessment Framework - High-Level Test Plan Guidelines
*Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025
*CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree
*CSP_controls_matrix_and_high_test_plan_2025
*Assessment template for Mandatory controls
*Assessment template for Advisory controls

  • A. Jump server(s), SWIFT-related components at application level
  • B. Personal tokens or mobile devices used as a possession factor
  • C. All equipment within the user environment
  • D. Operator PCs, (physical or virtual) systems running SWIFT-related components, network devices protecting the secure zone(s), bridging servers

Answer: B

Explanation:
The CSCF, under Control "6.1 Security Awareness" and related security controls, mandates the definition and implementation of a Password/PIN Policy for components requiring user authentication to protect the SWIFT environment. Let's evaluate each option:
*Option A: Operator PCs, (physical or virtual) systems running SWIFT-related components, network devices protecting the secure zone(s), bridging servers This requires a Password/PIN Policy. Operator PCs, systems running SWIFT components (e.g., Alliance Access), network devices (e.g., VPN boxes), and bridging servers need authentication policies to secure access, as per CSCF Control "2.3 System Hardening" and "6.1."
*Option B: Jump server(s), SWIFT-related components at application level This requires a Password/PIN Policy. Jump servers and application-level components (e.g., Alliance Gateway) must have authentication mechanisms to protect the secure zone, aligning with CSCF Control "1.1 SWIFT Environment Protection."
*Option C: Personal tokens or mobile devices used as a possession factor This does not require a Password/PIN Policy. Personal tokens or mobile devices (e.g., secure code cards or soft tokens) are possession factors used in multi-factor authentication (MFA), typically alongside a password or PIN. However, the CSCF does not mandate defining a Password/PIN Policy for thetokens/devices themselves, as their security relies on physical possession and manufacturer hardening, not user-defined policies. The "Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025" supports this by focusing policy requirements on systems, not possession factors.
*Option D: All equipment within the user environment
This requires a Password/PIN Policy. The CSCF applies policies to all in-scope equipment to ensure comprehensive security, contradicting the question's intent to identify an exception.
Summary of Correct answer:
A Password/PIN Policy must not be defined and implemented for personal tokens or mobile devices used as a possession factor (C).
References to SWIFT Customer Security Programme Documents:
*Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025: Control 6.1 and 2.3 mandate password policies for systems.
*Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025: Excludes possession factors from policy requirements.
*Assessment template for Mandatory controls: Focuses on system authentication policies.
========


NEW QUESTION # 80
The internet connectivity restriction control prevents having internet access on any CSCE m-scope components.

  • A. FALSE
  • B. TRUE

Answer: A

Explanation:
This question addresses the internet connectivity restriction control and its application to CSCF in-scope components. Let's verify this against Swift CSP guidelines.
Step 1: Understand the Internet Connectivity Restriction Control
TheSwift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, underControl 2.6: Internet Accessibility Restriction, mandates that in-scope components (e.g., Swift messaging interfaces, communication interfaces) must not have direct internet access to prevent exposure to external threats. However, this control allows for exceptions under specific conditions.
Step 2: Analyze the Statement
The statement claims that the internet connectivity restriction control "prevents having internet access on any CSCF in-scope components." The key is to determine if this is an absolute prohibition or if exceptions exist.
Step 3: Evaluate Against CSCF Guidelines
* Control 2.6: Internet Accessibility Restrictionrequires that Swift-related systems be isolated from the internet to minimize attack surfaces. This includes components like messaging interfaces (e.g., Alliance Access) and communication interfaces (e.g., SNL).
* However, theCSCF v2024andSwift CSP FAQallow for controlled internet access under specific circumstances, such as:
* Use of secure tunnels (e.g., VPNs) or proxies for authorized management purposes.
* Temporary access for software updates or patches, provided it is tightly controlled and monitored (perControl 6.1: Security Event Logging).
* The control does not impose an absolute ban but requires that any internet access be restricted, audited, and justified. Thus, the statement that it "prevents having internet access on any CSCF in-scope components" is too absolute.
Step 4: Conclusion and Verification
The statement isFALSEbecause, while internet access is heavily restricted for in-scope components, it is not entirely prevented under all circumstances (e.g., controlled access for maintenance). This aligns with the flexible yet secure approach of theCSCF v2024.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Control 2.6: Internet Accessibility Restriction.
* Swift CSP FAQ, Section: Internet Access Exceptions.


NEW QUESTION # 81
Which encryption methods are used to secure the communications between the SNL host and HSM boxes?

  • A. NTLS and SSH
  • B. MPLS and SSL
  • C. NTLS and Telnet
  • D. Telnet and SSL

Answer: A

Explanation:
This question focuses on the encryption methods securing communications between the SwiftNet Link (SNL) host and Hardware Security Module (HSM) boxes in the Swift environment.
Step 1: Understand SNL and HSM Communication
The SwiftNet Link (SNL) facilitates secure connectivity to the Swift network, while the HSM manages cryptographic keys. Secure communication between the SNL host and HSM is critical, as outlined inControl
2.5B: Cryptographic Key Managementof theCSCF v2024. These communications must use strong encryption protocols.
Step 2: Evaluate Each Option
* A. NTLS and SSH
* NTLS (Network Transport Layer Security): This is Swift's proprietary protocol for securing communications over the SwiftNet network, including between SNL and HSM. It provides end- to-end encryption and is widely used in Swift infrastructure, as confirmed in theSwift Alliance Gateway Technical Documentation.
* SSH (Secure Shell): SSH is used for secure management and administration of HSMs and SNL hosts, enabling encrypted remote access and configuration, as noted inSwift Security Best Practices.This combination aligns with Swift's security requirements for protecting HSM communications.Conclusion: This is correct.
* B. Telnet and SSL
* Telnet: An unencrypted protocol, unsuitable for secure communications, and not used in Swift's security framework perControl 2.6: Internet Accessibility Restriction.
* SSL (Secure Sockets Layer): An older encryption protocol, largely replaced by TLS in modern systems. Swift does not specify SSL for SNL-HSM communications, favoring NTLS.Conclusion: This is incorrect.
* C. NTLS and Telnet
* NTLS: As above, this is valid for SwiftNet communications.
* Telnet: As an unencrypted protocol, it is not acceptable for securing HSM communications, per Control 2.5B.Conclusion: This is incorrect.
* D. MPLS and SSL
* MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching): A networking technology for routing, not an encryption method, and not relevant to SNL-HSM security.
* SSL: As above, not used in this context by Swift.Conclusion: This is incorrect.
Step 3: Conclusion and Verification
The correct answer isA, as NTLS secures the data communication and SSH provides secure management access between the SNL host and HSM, consistent withCSCF v2024and Swift technical documentation.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Control 2.5B: Cryptographic Key Management, Control 2.6: Internet Accessibility Restriction.
* Swift Alliance Gateway Technical Documentation, Section: Network Security Protocols.
* Swift Security Best Practices, Section: HSM and SNL Configuration.


NEW QUESTION # 82
Select the correct statement(s) about the Swift Alliance Gateway. (Choose all that apply.)

  • A. It acts as the single window to SwiftNet messaging services by concentrating your traffic flows
  • B. The Alliance Gateway can only be accessed by a SWIFTNet user
  • C. It allows the creation and/or modification of some Swift messages (depending on the types &/or formats)
  • D. It allows sharing of PKI profiles between application or individuals, through the use of virtual profiles

Answer: A,D


NEW QUESTION # 83
......

The Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification (CSP-Assessor) Desktop-based practice Exam is ideal for applicants who don't have access to the internet all the time. You can use this Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification (CSP-Assessor) simulation software without an active internet connection. This CSP-Assessor software runs only on Windows computers. Both practice tests of Actualtests4sure i.e. web-based and desktop are customizable, mimic Swift CSP-Assessor real exam scenarios, provide results instantly, and help to overcome mistakes.

CSP-Assessor Valid Test Objectives: https://www.actualtests4sure.com/CSP-Assessor-test-questions.html

Our Actualtests4sure will be your best selection and guarantee to pass Swift CSP-Assessor exam certification, Swift 100% CSP-Assessor Correct Answers We guarantee you 100% certified, We also ensure that our support team and the core team of CSP-Assessor provide services to resolve all your issues, Besides, from economic perspective, our CSP-Assessor study dumps are priced reasonably so we made a balance between delivering satisfaction to customers and doing our own jobs, In terms of our CSP-Assessor training materials, the pass rate is one of the aspects that we take so much pride in because according to the statistics from the feedbacks of all of our customers, under the guidance of our CSP-Assessor preparation materials, the pass rate among our customers has reached as high as 98% to 100%, which marks the highest pass rate in the field.

However, only one subinterface happens to CSP-Assessor list an ip helper-address command, Generally, as with Certificates of Deposit, the longer the length of the duration of the CSP-Assessor Latest Exam Price annuity, the higher the interest rate that the insurance company will commit to.

Hot 100% CSP-Assessor Correct Answers 100% Pass | Efficient CSP-Assessor: Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification 100% Pass

Our Actualtests4sure will be your best selection and guarantee to pass Swift CSP-Assessor Exam Certification, We guarantee you 100% certified, We also ensure that our support team and the core team of CSP-Assessor provide services to resolve all your issues.

Besides, from economic perspective, our CSP-Assessor study dumps are priced reasonably so we made a balance between delivering satisfaction to customers and doing our own jobs.

In terms of our CSP-Assessor training materials, the pass rate is one of the aspects that we take so much pride in because according to the statistics from the feedbacks of all of our customers, under the guidance of our CSP-Assessor preparation materials, the pass rate among our customers has reached as high as 98% to 100%, which marks the highest pass rate in the field.

Report this page